The psychology of shooters. A shooting requires at least three things. a shooter, a victim, and a gun.
But a shooting takes place in a cultural context, in an atmosphere, a feeling for how things are. The question for young people forming their identity is who am I , and the crucial question is what do I move towards in society? Obviously we live in a time when there is very little political power and for most young people economic power seems far away. So the locus of power in society now is in guns. Imagine the landscape, perhaps the county, where you live. It is richly dotted with guns and each gun is a locus of potential power. As much in imagination as in physical reality but nevertheless fully real and felt by young people to be realizable.
So, yes, It takes a shooter, a gun, a victim, and an atmosphere.
The shooter has a young lifetime of alienation from the community of adults, parents, and friends.
Victims are easy. The world is filled with other kids and authorities.
Guns are always a problem and their presence is a magnet. My view is that they should have far less presence within a society bordering on zero.
The atmosphere is a combination of parental success, optimism about the future, integration into schools and peer groups and above all a sense of what worth life is about.
Churches used to be present in most communities and or a constant if dull reminder of an orientation to life. We have not yet found a way to match that. when we have a president and teenagers who share the psychology of winning is everything, weapons are cool, people are either winners or losers, we have nearly lost it.